|
2
Structural Issues on
1 page
|
The Democratic Deficit - How Poor Governance Drive
|
Democracy requires meaningful public participation, yet Owen Sound City Hall has systematically erected barriers that discourage resident engagement and undermine the very foundation of local governance.
The current environment actively repels public participation. Residents attempting to provide context before asking questions are rudely cut off by the mayor, even when requesting just ten minutes to explain complex issues. This dismissive treatment sends a clear message that public input is viewed as an inconvenience rather than a democratic right.
This hostility to public engagement serves the interests of an unaccountable administration that prefers to operate without scrutiny. When residents are discouraged from participating, staff face less questioning of their recommendations and Council receives less diverse input to challenge administrative preferences.
The consequences extend far beyond hurt feelings:
Weakened Decision-Making: Without robust public input, Council makes decisions based primarily on staff recommendations, missing crucial community perspectives and local knowledge.
Eroded Public Trust: When residents feel unwelcome and disrespected, they disengage from municipal politics entirely, creating a vicious cycle of declining participation and accountability.
Policy Failures: Important community concerns go unheard, leading to decisions that don’t reflect actual resident needs—such as the property tax burden forcing seniors from homes they’ve occupied for decades.
Council’s failure to maintain respectful, accessible public engagement processes represents a fundamental breach of democratic governance. You cannot serve residents effectively while simultaneously discouraging them from participating in the very processes designed to hold you accountable.
Restore dignity to public participation by ensuring respectful treatment of residents, allowing adequate time for meaningful input, and actively encouraging community engagement rather than treating it as a burden to be minimized.
|
|
Frances Williams
|
|
|
Council’s Abdication of Democratic Oversight
|
Council’s fundamental duty is to govern on behalf of residents, not to rubber-stamp staff recommendations. Yet Owen Sound has developed a troubling pattern where elected representatives have effectively surrendered their decision-making authority to unelected administrators.
The most egregious example occurred when the City Manager unilaterally withheld an independent consultant’s report from Council, claiming staff needed to “interpret” its findings first. This represents a complete inversion of democratic governance. Council members are elected to receive information directly and make independent judgments—not to accept pre-filtered interpretations from staff.
This abdication of oversight has created a cascade of problems. Staff now routinely bury Council in hundreds of pages of technical documents, then provide one-page summaries with their preferred recommendations. Time-pressed councillors predictably adopt these recommendations without proper scrutiny. City staff regularly inject themselves into Council debates uninvited, actively steering discussions toward their preferred outcomes rather than providing neutral professional advice.
Without proper oversight, senior management positions have grown 30% beyond comparable municipalities despite Owen Sound’s declining population, diverting taxpayer resources from actual services to bureaucratic overhead.
Council must reassert its democratic authority by establishing clear boundaries with staff, demanding unfiltered access to information, and taking back responsibility for independent decision-making. Residents elected you to govern—not to delegate that responsibility to unelected administrators
|
|
George Billingsware
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
|